‘One big focus group’
I’ve heard this term thrown around a bit (Google it) to describe ‘naturally occurring’ conversations on the internet as a rich source of customer insight. It annoys me.
Listening to/gathering online content is absolutely nothing like a focus group.
Beyond the obvious (ie there’s not a great deal of focus in terms of sample, or being able to probe specific topics), and maybe surprisingly, it lacks some key aspects of spontaneity than can be generated in a focus group. Moreover, unlike a focus group, it doesn’t readily provide a good foundation for analysis.
Highly edited
In many cases that we, as market researchers, will be interested in, the content that ends up in the netographer’s dragnet – eg a blog post, a comment on a community thread, a tweet, etc – is the product of a process that involves considerable cognitive effort on the part of the creator; either word crafting a thought/response, choosing an image, shooting and editing a video etc.
And various factors will shape that effort, such as the intended or perceived audience, the perceived importance of that audience, the background and motivation for generating and posting the content in the first place etc.
Clearly, this is a highly controlled, highly edited process – a fact that seems at odds with the perception of unsolicited online content as somehow more authentic than the content a researcher can get via other (more direct) methods of inquiry.
But the key issue here is that there are very few clues to help the researcher understand the motivations of any particular individual driving their broadcast to the online world.
The mother of issues
As a qualitative researcher, motivation is one of the key factors I’m interested in understanding. It’s the very cornerstone of my analysis; the context. But I can’t readily get that online. Without directly asking, in a timely and appropriate fashion (a whole other blog post), I’m not privy to the backroom.
Of course, not understanding the motivations/context behind the content is fine if you’re simply gathering and presenting content. But it’s the mother of issues if you want to provide your client with any substance.
We’re getting good at capturing data and making it look pretty. But is our industry paying enough attention to its analysis?





2 Responses to “The cornerstone”
I completely agree with you in a different way. A lot of folks think that all you have to do is grab stuff from the internet, put it through sentiment analysis, and you have research. That’s basically the same as letting your 12 year old write a survey about beer, give it to his friends, and call that survey research. There are tons of people doing online sentiment analysis, but hardly anyone doing real social media research.
Comment by lovestats
May 16th, 2010
You are so right, thank you.
My art teacher used to say to me (as I pronounced on how great was the art of Roger Dean or MC Escher) “Cleverness is Not Art” well…. “Information is Not Data”
Comment by crossman
May 19th, 2010
Leave a Comment